This has been another intense week(they weren't kidding with the title summer intensive!). I have been working out ideas to re vamp my first project. I will need to visit the site on Friday to cement my ideas but I want to make the connection between the figure and mother nature more reflected in my work. I'm hoping to figure out a way to physically tie them together in a not so obvious physical tying. I want to make it look like it fits in a spot just right. Made I should make smaller versions that lay into the tree in a certain way. I will have to revisit the space to really make a decision how. I have decided my idea for the second project and have started attempting to mold it. I don't feel like I have all that much control with this new method so I don't know how this is going to work but I'm trying to cast a football. I really really really hope I can accomplish this. I am very attached to the idea. I took the route of social commentary and think having a football,a masculine object to be tossed around that's rough and tumble be made out of a fragile substance you do not want to throw or be rough with. The fragility of masculinity.
The Articles:
The articles this week were intense also. I understand the debate of art vs craft to the outside world but does it still exist in the art academic world? I think less then in the art world, or amongst the rest of the world. We have the margins because as humans we need to rationalize and categorize to try and understand a world that we truly do not. It's human nature and in ingrained from survival. Can these hierarchy's be altered in our minds? Of course. It just takes the entire world, and even the art world for that matter a while to catch up. Or maybe it's a generational thing. Personally I would rather be called an artist than a fashion designer, ceramicist, or any other skill associated term. Is it necessary to communicate how we work? Sometimes perhaps but I wish it didn't.
The Altermodern article is such a huge article explaining a huge idea. At first I thought why doesn't everyone know about this? Maybe it hasn't been accepted yet but I have a sneaking suspicion the news or debate anyway isn't earth shattering because the general population is not concerned with what is perceived to only affect the art world. Meanwhile this idea about globalization, the wandering in time, space and mediums has everything to do with everyone. Bourraid's description of the arrow being disrupted and looping all over the place to me connects with the very thinking patterns present in our global society. This is why things are so confusing across the board. This makes me feel like I am old fashioned because I am under the margin, in ceramics anyway as more post modern. My concepts are more important to me than craft and I struggle with that. I love the primitive, the emotive, the touch of hand I suppose that could be Borders. In another sense though I can be taking from that time so it's Heterochronia. I just find this terminology tough to swallow because yes they are the directions people are going but so many of these categories can be used to describe work from before this said era. Many works of art are responses to travel, but I think what Bourriaud is trying to say is that it's in a different way. I also find it problematic to say the cause of this shift was the oil crisis and economic decline. These events definitely change people but I think there's more to it then that, I think it's more having to do with globalization. I definitely identify with his assertion of artists being nomads. I know I use knowledge from all over the place consciously and sub consciously and it can make generating ideas for work both exciting and adventurous although difficult sometimes because I have so many ideas and different directions. Sometimes I need a GPS ( usually bouncing ideas off other people, sometimes people who don't consider themselves artists can be really useful for this).